Overview
Capturing footage that contradicts a claimant’s reported restrictions is valuable, but only if it’s capable of surviving scrutiny at hearing, authenticates cleanly, and drives a fraud finding. This case illustrates how Delta Group’s integrated deployment of eRemote® unmanned surveillance and traditional field investigation produced a fully authenticated, court-admissible evidentiary record that resulted in a fraud finding and mandatory penalty against future awards.
Claim Background
The claimant, a 50-year-old janitor, filed a workers’ compensation claim after sustaining a cervical and right shoulder injury. Accepted diagnoses included C5-6 and C6-7 cervical disc herniations and right shoulder tendinosis, with right shoulder surgery pending and actively litigated. His treating provider placed him at 100% disability, restricting him to sedentary activity, prohibiting overhead right upper extremity use, and limiting lifting to five pounds. At a recent IME, the claimant presented with a soft cervical collar and ambulated with a cane.
Early in the investigation, database and traditional surveillance efforts confirmed the claimant had vacated the address of record. Subject location was reestablished at a new address in a bordering state, a jurisdictional wrinkle that required a more adaptive investigative posture.
Investigative Strategy: Layered Surveillance Deployment
With the claimant now residing across state lines at an undisclosed address, Delta Group transitioned to a combined approach: eRemote® unmanned surveillance deployed at the confirmed new residence, supported by targeted traditional field coverage.
eRemote® Unmanned Surveillance
eRemote® provided continuous, covert monitoring across multiple observation periods spanning early morning through late evening without the operational exposure risk inherent in sustained field presence. The system documented the claimant across multiple days in a consistent pattern of bilateral upper extremity use, overhead reaching, vehicle operation, and sustained physical exertion, directly contradicting both the treating physician’s disability assessment and the functional limitations presented at IME.
Traditional Field Surveillance
Field surveillance added evidentiary depth and real-time contextual detail. Investigators documented the claimant operating powered lawn equipment, performing exterior property maintenance, and arriving at the residence as the operator of a commercial van bearing “Licensed and Insured Plumbing and Heating Contractors” signage — consistent with active employment or undisclosed business operation. Throughout all observation periods, the claimant displayed no use of the cervical collar or assistive device documented at IME, and movement was fluid and unrestricted.
Authentication and Admissibility
At the workers’ compensation hearing on February 19, 2026, Delta Group investigators testified to authenticate the surveillance record in its entirety. The eRemote® footage presented a heightened authentication burden: opposing counsel scrutinized the methodology, chain of custody, and technical operation of the remote system with precision. Delta Group’s investigators met that scrutiny directly, demonstrating command of the system’s operational protocols, responding to granular technical questioning without hesitation, and establishing the evidentiary foundation the court required.
All video evidence, both eRemote® and traditional, was admitted. Delta Group’s 100% court admissibility success ratio remains intact.
Result
The admitted surveillance evidence supported a fraud finding and a mandatory penalty assessed against the claimant’s future awards —a significant litigation outcome for the carrier’s defense team.
“Your knowledge of the remote surveillance procedure coupled with your readiness to answer very specific questions at the hearing showed you were prepared and thorough in your process. This claimant activity…helped my client secure a fraud finding and a mandatory penalty against future awards. I appreciate your efforts and would absolutely recommend Delta in the future!”
— Defense Attorney, Workers’Compensation Hearing, February 2026
Considerations for Claims and SIU Professionals
When a subject relocates mid-investigation, eRemote®’s flexibility and extended operational hours support rapid redeployment without sacrificing coverage continuity. The combination of unmanned and traditional surveillance produces a richer record than either solution deployed alone: remote coverage mitigates detection risk during extended monitoring windows, while field investigation captures mobile activity away from the residence and behavioral observations that strengthen the overall file.
The evidentiary value of footage is only as strong as the testimony behind it. Having investigators who can articulate methodology, system integrity, and chain of custody under direct examination — and hold up under cross — is what converts strong surveillance into actionable results. Delta Group’s investigators are prepared to defend the work, not just deliver it.
%20(1).webp)